Readings: Job 19.23-27 and Matthew
8.28-34 (and 1 Samuel 15)
I didn't think I had the stomach for 1
Samuel 15 or the numerous texts from the Hebrew Bible where all men,
women, children and animals perish. I also chose the reading from
Matthew to remind us that the New Testament is not death or violence
free either, even in an act of healing. Perhaps, though, we can stomach
a herd of pigs perishing a bit more easily than other narratives.
I also was glad that Dave Lees has
already taken us, last week, into an explanation about Marcion and
why there can be seen to be advantages (and disadvantages) in just removing all
'offensive' material and having a much shorter text in front of us!
What we do have in our hands, is our
scripture, our holy book, the texts that the Church 'set apart' and
that we turn to. How we use it though, that's vital. How do we use
it?
I'm reminded of the indigenous South
American who reflecting on the 500th anniversary since Europeans
quoted Jomo Kenyatta (from Kenya) who said “When the Missionaries
arrived, the Africans had the Land and the Missionaries had the
Bible. They taught us how to pray with our eyes closed. When we
opened them, they had the Land and we had the Bible.” How readily the bible served for those from the West controlling, subjecting, other cultures (even destroying the culture and being complicit in new genocides). How do we use
these texts? With great care because we must be mindful of how great
a misuse we can put our bibles to.
It's not just a misuse of the the bible
that's the hazard, though, but a justification, from the bible, for
constructing versions of God that are redundant. We must be grateful
to the many atheists from the last two or three centuries who have
helped the church to throw off versions of God that used to be quite
ordinary and yet now are utterly distasteful to us. We have managed
this and still kept the same scriptures, but we're reading
differently to the way we used to.
We even can misuse the very text that
is in front of us. Job in his complaint in chapter 19 is furious with
God and wants his complaint against God heard, but believes death
will come before justice does, so he wants the challenge against a
version of God he cannot bear, inscribed in a rock so his argument
does not get lost. Job, in talking of a redeemer or champion living,
is talking about his own case against God (not about Jesus). He also
is not espousing eternal life, but an everlasting objection to the
kind of God that's brought about his suffering. He'd rather his case is heard before death, so he can argue face to face, but if not, he certainly doesn't want his quest for justice ended simply through death, God's got some answering to do and Job's going to make sure it happens in life, or in death.
Job longs for justice with every fibre
of his being and keeps at it before his life is dragged from him,
even though he feels flayed alive. When he says “I've escaped by
the skin of my teeth” the irony is palpable, teeth have no skin, he
feels liked he's simply being skinned alive by the enormity of both
his physical and psychological suffering. To add insults to injury,
his friends, his “friends” all line up with versions of God that
justify the agony Job's in, he really doesn't need this! We all know
those moments when there's so much that's wrong with the version of
things that is regarded as central that we find ourselves at the
edge of things, holding on by our finger-tips (by the skin of our teeth).
But I don't think we need to simply be left
feeling like we're losing our grip. Rather it's time we got a grip,
making a commitment to let go of false constructions of God and
instead speak of and believe in a God whose nature is of infinite
and immeasurable love. Just as Job argues with versions of God
he eschews, so we must take courage in arguing with versions of God
that are counter to God's nature.
We must remember that 1 Samuel 15
was used by those preaching before the massacres, the genocide, in
Rwanda. The bible before us can be so used to abuse, that we must
find a different way to hold it. It is only then, when we argue with the
versions of God we must bid farewell to that keeping hold of faith in
an all loving God is possible while keeping the scripture firmly in
our hands. Amen
2 comments:
I have nothing particularly intelligent to say in response to this except that I really liked reading this. I hadn't really considered before that everyone who has read anything from the Bible before me over the last 2000 years has taken some bits and left others, put their own interpretation on what they read, and in their own head, made the Bible entirely their own. So it is comforting to think that it is not wrong of me to want to do the same and to believe that when the God of the Bible seems vengeful, judgemental or just downright capricious, that doesn't have to be the message I come away with.
Thanks 'standingonthebrink' you've put it much more succinctly than I managed in the sermon, I think you get the point better than I do myself!
Post a Comment